The Anti-Imperialist Movement Grows in the Philippines, Part Two
by Wendy Hazard

Continued from the autumn issue

As a Fulbright scholar who was teaching courses in the history of US foreign policy at the University of the East, I was often asked to speak at other universities all over the Philippines. I used these opportunities to talk about the role the U.S. has played in the Middle East since the end of World War II, and the Bush Administration's recent policy toward Iraq. Among the most memorable of these forums was a Mindanao-wide conference on international relations that had gathered, for the first time ever, Muslim and Christian students for a frank discussion of international affairs and their implications for the Philippines. When it became clear to the audience that I was critical of US intentions in Iraq, students and faculty members at first were shocked, and then, it seemed, grateful for the opportunity to let loose their own feelings. Several Muslim students were convinced that the war on terror was a religious war against Islam. While I tried to emphasize the United States' very real geo-strategic interests in the Persian Gulf and central Asia, I had to acknowledge that Bush's invocation of a "crusade" against terrorism and his political reliance on the evangelical Christian right were evidence that these young people weren't altogether wrong.

Others in that audience, and in subsequent forums as well, expressed fear that once again, the Philippines would be dragged into a broader war over which they would have no control and in which they were likely to suffer greatly. Some recalled what happened in World War II when the Japanese attacked US bases in the Philippines and then occupied the entire country for four years. Many Filipinos believe that they were badly betrayed by General Douglas MacArthur's poor military planning that allowed the Japanese an easy victory in 1941, and by U.S. military planners, who quickly withdrew the US command from the Philippines and decided to concentrate US war efforts in Europe, not Asia. Filipinos suffered terribly under Japanese occupation, and got precious little assistance during that period from their alleged protector and benefactor. The Americans finally "liberated" the Philippines in 1945 from Japanese occupation with a massive bombing campaign that destroyed much of Manila and thousands of homes, churches and historic buildings in other cities and towns as well.

Filipinos also recall the Vietnam war when their soldiers were drafted to fight alongside the Americans, and when Clark Airfield and the Subic Naval Base became launching sites for air and sea attacks on Vietnam. Spent fuel, toxic debris, and rusted ordnance poisoned the soil and groundwater on the bases and in all the outlying communities, as well. Today, the bases are a wasteland, and cancer rates in adjoining communities have soared. During all of this time, American soldiers stationed at Clark and Subic and those taking R & R leave in the Philippines spent their money freely. Bars, brothels and strip joints flourished, distorting local economies and destroying the lives of young Filipinas who were lured into prostitution. The Marcoses and their cronies profited handsomely from the trade. Their countrymen and women bear the scars. Like many of their counterparts in Japan and South Korea, Filipino nationalists want no part of U.S. military bases.

When the war in Iraq finally broke out, tens of thousands of Filipinos in cities and towns all over the Philippines took to the streets in angry protest. The police and the Army struck back. In Manila, a contingent of Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) team, armed with machine guns, kept the crowds at a distance from the US embassy, and then dispersed them with water canons and truncheons. In Bagio City, Cebu and Iloilo, anti riot police blocked protesters from marching on government buildings, and in Mindanao, the Philippine Army, with the Pentagon's generous financial support, stepped up its assaults on MILF strongholds and on communist guerrilla forces. Human rights groups accused the military of abuses, including the murder and disappearance of prominent activists. Randy David, a prominent journalist wrote in the Philippine Daily Inquirer, "What the (Philippine) government is doing in Mindanao and the rest of the country is becoming clear. To put it bluntly, it is trying to put an end to the Moro rebellion, the communist insurgency, and the mass poverty that breeds them, by riding piggyback on the American war on global terrorism." He concluded with a warning. "We have nothing to gain... But if our recent past is a guide, it should tell us in very clear terms what dependence on outside powers has done to us. It has prevented us from looking inward and developing our own resources and energies. It has destroyed our confidence in ourselves. It has prolonged our birthing as a nation."

Filipinos face enormous difficulties in binding their divided nation and building just and sustainable economies that will provide decent opportunities for all. But they are a resilient people who, in a regional partnership with their neighbors in Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia and China , can build a strong nation that does not need to tolerate political corruption, perpetual wars or dependence on the long arm of Uncle Sam. They know this and articulate it brilliantly. I was privileged to spend time with some of them and look forward to working with the friends I made there in the years ahead.


Back to Peace Talk Index, Winter, 2003 - 2004

| Home| About Us| Contact Us| Upcoming Events| Peace Talk| Volunteer| Financial Support | Links & Resources|
| Merchandise | Action Committee | Nuclear Weapons Issues | World-Wide Peace Issues |

Please contact Donna Jones at West End Webs, e-mail: donnajjones@gwi.net,
with questions or suggestions regarding the web site.